The writing meta is shifting. What used to be good style is now just considered AI slop, so you have to learn how to write in a way that is good, but still different than AI style. I think that’s really interesting.
The writing meta is shifting. What used to be good style is now just considered AI slop, so you have to learn how to write in a way that is good, but still different than AI style. I think that’s really interesting.
What used to be considered good style is still considered good style. Good style does not confuse January with August
https://www.technologyreview.com/2025/09/25/1124005/ai-wikipedia-vulnerable-languages-doom-spiral/
I think style is different than content. I could (and probably do sometimes) write something totally false in a good style.
Good point I just really wanted to show that article to someone
Anyways, AI “style” isn’t the former desirable style because it involves a lot of “say a lot to mean a little”, if you get what I mean
Yeah, that’s true