my website is at the bottom part of the graph

You mean less scam websites where made in the past?

That’s true

If the page is mostly plaintext with a few images from Windows 7 or earlier and a download link at the bottom, you know you’re in the right place

jeffalo:

👍

7/9/2022, 9:12:29 PM

im not sure what that means but i think i get it by a little bit

Very true

I'm the opposite

oren:

The better its designed the more I trust it

7/6/2022, 7:12:47 PM

jeffalo:

for me, a super simple website will get my trust, whereas a half-way-there website will be super untrustworthy. well designed websites will get my trust, but idk theres something in me that doesnt like if a website feels like its trying too hard, so a well designed website isn’t trusted as much as a simple site. i hope that made sense lol.

7/6/2022, 7:36:44 PM

oren:

yeah

7/6/2022, 7:46:59 PM

micahlt:

Yikes - what would you consider wasteof on this scale?

7/6/2022, 9:12:21 PM

jeffalo:

wasteof2 falls somewhere down the further part of the scale, but wasteof3 is a little bit more to the 'less well designed' side. at least that's the plan

7/7/2022, 7:20:54 AM

micahlt:

Intentionally or unintentionally lol

7/7/2022, 1:04:57 PM

jeffalo:

wasteof3 is intentionally designed to be a little less professional than wasteof2.

7/7/2022, 3:17:22 PM

micahlt:

Why is that?

7/7/2022, 3:28:20 PM

jeffalo:

i felt like wasteof2 took itself too seriously, if that makes sense.

this gives me the freedom to experiment with new styles & experiences in wasteof3

7/7/2022, 4:33:46 PM

micahlt:

Fair enough :)

7/7/2022, 5:07:08 PM

diblix:

what did wasteof2 look like?

7/8/2022, 1:21:04 AM

jeffalo:

wasteof.money

7/8/2022, 6:03:07 AM

9point0:

which i absolutely despise

7/16/2022, 12:53:48 AM