alright time to make an alt account because i’m not going to do that on this account
pkmnq beta
woah! text
woah! text
alright time to make an alt account because i’m not going to do that on this account
I reposted zagle’s post earlier, but here’s a 97.9%
My circle is 97.0% perfect, can you beat that? https://neal.fun/perfect-circle/
(this was in under 10 minutes)
I don’t actually know if I use scissors properly, I change the way I do it every single time I use one and they all seem equally effective
There were also green things on the stains
It probably told a story bit I couldn’t read it
ok but can you get to me-in-2021-on-the-TBGs level frequency of posting
Fine I'll hide a message in the post
Uh @luigispizza
Can I use your idea of what to hide
Kindly let me use it I can't think of anything
Can I swear here and make sexual jokes? I mean the rules don’t touch the subject…
Hello @phantomluigi
Everyone say hello to @phantomluigi or smth idk
I’m still doubting the motivation was mainly to make the longest post chain, this would be perfect on the TBG Forums, it would definitely get at least 25 posts before falling into the second page and becoming forgotten. It was definitely part of it, but I think the TBG aspect of it was the primary thing here. Or maybe I have a very low standard of what fun is, who knows.
If you’re making a wasteof client, add this and I will start using it immediately:
THE “NOPE WE’RE NOT DOING THAT” LIST
If you add a post to this list, the post, reposts of the post, reposts of those reposts, etc. will be collapsed, only showing the users in the repost chain. This is obviously useful for repost chains that annoy you (even though I’m pro-repost chains there are definitely ones that don’t deserve to exist), but it’s also useful discussions that you just want to be done with, and 5 people reposting the same thing that you don’t care about.
This would solve the only problem I have with wasteof.
Now that I’m actually in one, I can see what I forgot to mention, which is two things:
The repetition. I joked about it a bit in my post joking about imadeanaccount’s definition of “constructiveness”. My definition is anything that adds on to any form of communication, whether a discussion, a joke, a game in the case of the TBGs. Repetition in a discussion isn’t constructive. It doesn’t even have to be the same user, I remember seeing a few users back then who blatantly just went with whatever their favorite “side” said. Even the side I was on did this and I hated every second of it. This is much better but still present in recent times (for one, I don’t see the favorite side thing anymore, separate people are seperate people again :D)
The sheer amount of posts. This is only made worse by the repetition. Going back to the favorite “side” thing, you can imagine what it’s like for the same 3 people to say the same thing, and then repost each other’s post saying the thing in agreement. I’m glad that’s over. But even still, the posts are way too much. Repost chains are one thing, but they usually contain short amounts of text. Discussions have to actually mean something (or, for some people, at least look like they do). And that’s why I favor comments for actual substantial discussion over reposts.
For this one I decided the wasteof formatting would be too restrictive for how I wanted to convey things here, so I put the thing here instead:
https://tbgforums.com/forums/index.php?msg=718213
I forgot that TBG links do weird things, so you’ll have to open it twice for it to work properly