ko
Joined 14 years ago ........................................................................... My YouTube: Pacifiky. MERN Stack Web Developer, Video Editor, 3D artist, Bad Programmer. Professionally Immature
Joined 14 years ago ........................................................................... My YouTube: Pacifiky. MERN Stack Web Developer, Video Editor, 3D artist, Bad Programmer. Professionally Immature
Les go! Murder drones season 1! 🎉 https://youtube.com/watch?v=tAh67F9azNU
I hate that SO MUCH
50% of these are just useless with css
<!--...--> : comment tag. Kinda boring but useful 7/10
<!DOCTYPE> : document type. Useless 2/10
<a> : link. One of the best tags ever 10/10
<abbr> : underrated 7/10
<address> : underrated also 6/10
<area> : complex but useful 6/10
<article> : underused 7/10
<aside> : defines a sidebar. Should have just been css 5/10
<audio> : eh idk 6/10
<b> : bold. should have been css 5/10
<base> : ig it’s useful so ok 7/10
<bdi> : one of those elements everyone forgets about. should just be css or smth idk 5/10
<bdo> : should just be css bruh 5/10
<blockquote> : quote. kinda cool 7/10
<body> : 8/10
<br> : html go brrrrr 10/10
<button> : cool 10/10
<canvas> : too complex imo. and it requires javascript 7/10
<caption> : another one people forget about. not very useful 6/10
<cite> : citation. Seems kinda useless to me 5/10
<code> : fun 8/10
<col> : a column 7/10
<colgroup> : why 5/10
<data> : what does this even do?? 5/10
<datalist> : bruh just use a dropdown menu 7/10
<dd> : why is this needed 5/10
<del> : what the heck if text is deleted it should be removed, not kept 3/10
<details> : actually underrated. This should be added to wasteof.money 9/10
<dfn> : makes no sense whatsoever 2/10
<dialog> : I love this one 10/10
<div> : useful 9/10
<dl> : even less useful than <dd>. 1/10
<dt> : bruh why 2/10
<em> : wait bruh why not just use <i> 3/10
<embed> : use iframe imo 6/10
<fieldset> : idk about this one 7/10
<figcaption> : why couldn’t they just use the normal caption element? 3/10
<figure> : why do you need this? there’s other options they could have done 2/10
<footer> : cool and useful 8/10
<form> : one of the most useful tags ever 10/10
<h1> to <h6> : different levels of headings. I think it should have been css but eh whatever 6.5/10
<head> : kinda cool 6/10
<header> : the same as <footer> 8/10
<hr> : dang that’s actually kinda cool. I didn’t know about it until this. Imma have to use it some 8/10
<html> : ok 7/10
<i> : italics ok 8/10
<iframe> : cool but they added so many restrictions that it’s not as good anymore 7/10
<img> : images are great 10/10
<input> : cool 8/10
<ins> : just like <del>, why in the world is this needed?? 3/10
<kbd> : actually kinda cool 7/10
<label> : pretty cool but they should have used it for more than just inputs 7/10
<legend> : could they not have used <label>???? bruh 3/10
<li> : pretty cool 9/10
<link> : idk why they needed this but ok 6/10
<main> : eh 7/10
<map> : complicated 6/10
<mark> : highlights are very cool 9/10
<marquee> : the king of all html 147/10
<meta> : eh 7/10
<meter> : this actually looks really cool and underused wow 10/10
<nav> : navbar be like 8/10
<noscript> : kinda sad that there are still people who don’t use javascript but whatever 6/10
<object> : what the heck just use iframe
<ol> : not much to say here 7/10
<optgroup> : they could have done this another way but eh 8/10
<option> : an option in a dropdown list 7/10
<output> : what is the use of this?? still it’s pretty cool 8/10
<p> : nothing like the classics amirite 9/10
<param> : seems like this should just be an attribute 2/10
<picture> : that’s actually kinda cool idk 6/10
<pre> : eh 7/10
<progress> : whoa I didn’t know about this one and it looks really cool 10/10
<q> : why not use <blockquote>??? 4/10
<rp> : kinda like noscript, just there for compatibility 6/10
<rt> : basically it explains East Asian text 7/10
<ruby> : I like this one’s name 8/10
<s> : strikethrough be like 7/10
<samp> : this also looks really cool and underrated 9/10
<script> : one of the best tags ever 11/10
<section> : why not use a <div>?? 5/10
<select> : personally I really like this one. I like dropdown lists 9/10
<small> : should have been css but whatever 6/10
<source> : why not use the src attribute??
<span> : another one that should just be a div
<strong> : bold text. but you should just use <b> 4/10
<style> : css is hard to use but it makes stuff look cool 7/10
<sub> : subscripted text be like 8/10
<svg> : kinda cool but a bit hard to use 7/10
<table> : an underused element 7/10
<tbody> : 6/10
<td> : why did they name it “td” for a table cell?? 7/10
<template> : I don’t understand this one 5/10
<textarea> : pretty cool 8/10
<tfoot> : 6/10
<th> : header cell in a table 7/10
<thead> : 6/10
<time> : doesn’t do anything special 7/10
<title> : 5/10
<tr> : row in a table 7/10
<track> : idk tbh 6/10
<u> : underline be like 8/10
<ul> : unordered list 7/10
<var> : math be like 8/10
<video> : video is great 10/10
<wbr> : when there might be a line break but you’re not quite sure 7/10
This list is a joke
