gilbert189 beta
i'm gilbert_given_189 on Scratch.
i'm gilbert_given_189 on Scratch.
...
# Elitism
l33ts = sorted_pop[:round(POPULATION_SIZE * ELITE_PORTION)]
n00bs = sorted_pop[round(POPULATION_SIZE * ELITE_PORTION):]
...Oh wait this isn’t 2006 anymore
My lecturer straight up refuses to read my flowchart only because it has annotations in it, saying that it’s “unreachable”, and thus has no reason to exist
Only when I removed the annotations, he says that he can start to read it
M: “It’s a holey ground around you. Would you rather tiptoe and walk slowly, or quickly leap to the goal and risk falling through a hole?”
K: “Well, if you know where you’re going, you won’t fall to a hole.“
never have I attempted to write a number on their floating point representation by hand
My sister got really mad because her look alike in my TC save got married to Paddler, a Rhythm Heaven character
Now she insisted me to make her break up with him…
procedure insertion sort(a_1, a_2, ..., a_n)
...
while a_j < a_i
i := i + 1 // WHERE DO WE GO FROM HERE?
m := a_jThis is what we are debating on discrete math class
Am I the only one that writes Promises like this?
new Promise((ok, err) => {
// ...
})Meanwhile, on some game distro website…
No Linux support
★☆☆☆☆
No Linux support. Completely unplayable.
I took so long writing my report that the lab got used for metaverse class (yes, we have them) (yes, it feels like business)
The only thing I remember about that class is what pull and push marketing is
Task: Find a woman who has a throat of silicon.
(New) A computer that does nothing but giving misinformation, defeated by giving too much facts
A computer that controls a lab facility, defeated from attempted murder
Computer characters I’ve met and remembered:
An evil lab computer that craves for information to fulfill one of its purpose, defeated by questioning love
A labor-supporting computer that had gone corrupt, defeated by taking two friends of the story’s protagonist
A computer that took over the Internet with assistance of a human, defeated by another computer assisted by the same human
After some thoughts, I feel like this argument is half-incorrect
It’s easy to make, sure, but it’s not easy to crack. As a one-off, it’s very secure, but when people use it a lot, it gets weaker
I’ve been considering Jefallo’s 2022 idea of a password manager, but I quickly realized it’s not more secure than using this password pattern:
@[email protected]|password123