cw screenreader unfriendly
not many people know about this really cool javascript feature that i use a lot
function test(t) { return t + " :3" }
test`:3`
=> ":3 :3"cw screenreader unfriendly
not many people know about this really cool javascript feature that i use a lot
function test(t) { return t + " :3" }
test`:3`
=> ":3 :3"
lily discovers string interpolation:
string interpolation is this:
i didn’t do string interpolation, i did whatever that thing is (it’s how preact works)
you can return objects and stuff too not just strings
I know what it is, what I meant is you should have used it
no, it was an example. if you’re being pedantic i shouldn’t even write
`${":3"} :3`, just":3 :3", but for the purposes of that example i was using a function because That’s The JavaScript Feature In Questionyou should have done
return `${t} :3`because it does the same thing and is just as readable but takes up less spacewho cares it literally does not matter for the example. the variable is literally called
tin the example do you think i cared about readability just to show off cool features? not really, it’s still just as readable to writet + " :3"programmer beef
fr
i don’t even get it like there was no need for him to say that, it doesn’t matter